From: "Adams, Stephen" <adams.sd@pg.com>
To: "Darce Fardy" <darce@eastlink.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:39 PM
Subject: RE: RE:
Darce:
My position is simple. Any information should be made available, unless it is of a personal nature or may be a security breach. And, those seeking it shouldn't be made to be precise in what they are requesting. Intent should be the determining factor.
Stephen
To:
Darce Fardy
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 8:18 PM
Subject: Re:
Dear Mr. Fardy,
I am absolutly in favour of completely open access to information that does not legally have to be kept private. In fact I sometimes think that the act is actually used as a door to hide behind to delay the public. I do not believe that the public should have to pay for information that belongs to them and I will whenever possible make available information that is not protected as private to my constituents for the asking. Lack of openess and information needed for people to make informed decisions has been a problem in my district for a long time and I will not continue on this path.
David Sampson
Candidate for Councillor District 18
dksampson@hfx.eastlink.ca
Posts
All Comments
